2012-12-12

psyop#911Truther

11.15 ..12.12: pol/purges/controlled demolition:

12.12: summary of psyop#911Truther:
. a psyop (psychology operation trying to
sabotage a Truther movement)
typically works by mixing the good with the bad info .
. it's been my general impression
that Dr. Judy Wood has been the most trustworthy,
and certainly has provided the most useful info .
. when seeing other Truthers outed as psyop agents,
keep in mind that every one has a gift too .
. as I studied Controlled Demolition
my theories have converged with Dr.Wood's;
however, I'm also convinced of a 911neocon conspiracy
whereas Dr.Wood doesn't speculate about this topic .

12.9: how I found RationalWiki:
. I was googling Hutchison Effects
for researching Dr.Judy Wood's theories
related to 9/11 dustification involving clean nuclear
generating radio waves of many frequencies
that when done in a static field
like a hurricane or thunder storm
provides a way to demagnetize nuclear forces
to cause cold pyroclastics .

12.9: RationalWiki/Spacebeams rebuttal is high-priority:
. Dr.Wood is the Truther's best shot;
because she is lean on theory
and heavy on evidence .
. then the recent PBS documentary by the
(Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth)
also is consistent with her,
and they are not refuted on this page either .
. she has gotten the leanest coverage
relative to her case's importance;
I would help refute her,
but besides a plague of nitpicking,
the only thing I could find fatally irrational,
was someone suggesting their own gov could do that
and then try taking them to court
-- as if that would be possible! LOL ;) .

11.17?: web, news:
Dr. Judy Wood - Real 9/11 Truth Playlist
- by 1stageofawareness's channel

"The Price of Secrecy, The Consequences of Cover Up"
by Andrew Johnson -
--- See also Dr. Judy Wood - Where Did the Towers Go -
recorded at New Horizons, St Annes, UK, 24th Oct 2011
Part 1, Part 2 .
-----
There are many more audios in the archive section
of Andrew Johnson's website;
and previous interviews with Dr. Judy Wood
on her website .
Andrew Johnson's book "9/11 - Finding the Truth"
can be downloaded for free from here .
. see this checktheevidence listing
for individual articles from the book,
as well as further articles written after the book .
See for example
"Meet the New Boss - Same as the old boss -
The Perception Management of 9/11 Evidence"
for an analysis of some of Jim Fetzer's behaviour:
Jim Fetzer and Steven E. Jones
were the faces of the first major "9/11 truth" group,
Scholars for 9/11 Truth.
They had a very public disagreement
and a ridiculous pantomime ensued,
before Jones split from the group to create his own group;
Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice.
In hindsight, this was all part of the [gov's]
psy' op's of 9/11 perception management.
-----
See also Morgan Reynolds'
"Bombs Did Not Unravel the Towers"
-----
Related videos:
Heavy Watergate
Rumsfeld & Directed Energy Weaponry
11.20:
http://drjudywood.com/articles/short/Fetzer_Hutchison.html

11.20: web: John Hutchison:
(I'm looking for the Hutchison that Dr.Wood speaks of;
I'm not sure who on youtube by that name is really him)

[speaking of Hutchison, one commenter asks:]
why isn't this guy on wikipedia?
John Hutchison in reply to Krazeel 1 month ago :
"(
. i had myself removed from wiki
as my stalkers would rewrite the articles
under threat wiki got rid of me .
) .
. that "Hutchison" has a youtube page:
HI !FOLKS THIS IS THE ONLY OFFICIAL
JOHN KENNETH HUTCHISON YOUTUBE CHANNEL
ENJOY ALL THE OFFBEAT NEVER MENTIONED STUFF HERE,
uploads all the time I TAKE DONATIONS ONLY AT
http://www.gofundme.com/hutchison-effect-energy
thank you kindly,,, LOTS!!!!!! ill keep posting great vids ,,,
NEVER DONATE TO ANY OTHER WEBSITE KNOWN AS SCAM SITES
'WWW.HUTCHISONEFECT.CA IS A SCAMSITE',,,
ONLY OFFICIAL WEBSITE FOR TV FOOTAGE IS
WWW.GRYPHONPRODUCTIONS.COM
HI DEFINITION FOOTAGE FOR TV BROADCASTonly
STAY TUNED FOR SURPRISE TWO NEW TV SHOWS
JESSE VENTURA TRU TV SHOW SEASON 3 BIG SURPRISE
AND POLARSHIFT FILMS SOMEWHERE OUT THERE AIRING SOON MEDIAS
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-403054
checkmy links as well and donate thanks
http://www.gofundme.com/hutchison-effect-energy
20:
. he has a page on the rationalwiki.org:
. they have him listed under Pseudoscience,
Bloggers, Free energy, Shysters .
. they point to this youtube .

20: he's at the Pure Energy Systems peswiki:
27:
-- that has a link that needs updating,
1979, Hutchison Effect discovered,

21: todo: use #fascism in the title:
. relate to controlling investigation and dumping site evidence
(claims steel shipped to china but no verification that
dustification resulted in the same steel it took down
Hutchison effects include element transitions)
put in summary how this is related .
. Wood also mentioned that
the same thing that happened to 9/11,
also happened in the Oklahoma truck bombing
-- bizarre effects not fully explained by a truck bomb,
and then this same demolition service is hired
to squirrel away the result in shady ways .
22:
. technically fascism doesn't really mean that;
how about #TrustMe #TopSecret ?

21: news: 9-11 red-herring theory:

AlienScientist`Black 9/11:
Money, Motive, Technology, and Plausible Deniability
. I call this red-herring theory; because,
it claims that 9-11 was used as a red-herring
(ie, throwing search dogs off the scent)
by getting rid of a lot of corruption evidence
while making it look like a hijacking disaster .
12.12:
. I still think this case has merit;
but, the best way to fight corruption
is by prevention with transparency policies;
and it's also important to consider,
that they might also be 911neocons,
which means it's an on-going conspiracy:
you can expect more terror from globalists .

[22: vid: 9-11 red-herring theory:
. see minute 27:00 of this vid for evidence that
nano-thermite alone
could do the 9-11 dustification effects .
... but, that's not a good link for what he's trying to prove;
because, that technology appeared to involve a torch:
Taku Murakami, US Patent 5532449
- Using plasma ARC and thermite to demolish concrete .
. if you're going to plasma without a torch
(as with nuclear demolitions lighting up the whole area)
then you no longer need thermite! ]
. that vid comes with these links:
Special thanks to Michael C. Ruppert, Mark H. Gaffney, and Kevin Ryan
for their dedicated research in bringing this information out of the
shadowy black operations underworld from which it came.
This video is a compilation of evidence they have uncovered.
"Crossing the Rubicon" - The Decline of American Empire
at the end of the age of oil
"Black 911" by Mark H. Gaffney:
Was 9/11 an Inside Job?
A guide to 9/11 Whistleblowers
Project Hammer
WTC 6
SEC Act Section 12(k)2:
Richard Grove's testimony (complete transcript)
"Collateral Damage" by E.P. Heidner The CIA's forty-year complicity in the narcotics trade by Alfred W. McCOY Executive Order 12333 created an agreement between the CIA and Justice Department (DEA)
to look the other way on Government Drug Trafficking: AIG and Drug Money Maurice Greenberg's report for the CFR Richard Armitage, Frank Carlucci, Herbert Winokur, and company Post 9/11 Promotions: 9/11 Gold Theft and other smoking guns: Kevin Ryan's landmark article on
who had "Demolition access to the WTC Towers":
tenants Security:
 Convergence:

Clean Up: Kevin R. Ryan, et al, Environmental anomalies at the World Trade Center:
evidence for energetic materials,

The Environmentalist, Volume 29, Number 1 / March, 2009,
Kevin R. Ryan, The Top Ten Connections Between
NIST and Nanothermites,
Journal of 9/11 Studies, July 2008,

Website for In-Q-Tel, Wikipedia page for Jerome Hauer, Peter Jennings interview with Jerome Hauer, ABC,
on 9/11, 14:53, available on You Tube,

Taku Murakami, US Patent 5532449
- Using plasma ARC and thermite to demolish concrete,

Albert Gibson et al, Integral low-energy thermite igniter, US Patent number: 4464989,
Michael C. Ruppert, Suppressed Details of Criminal Insider Trading Lead Directly into the CIA's Highest Ranks, October 9, 2001,
Kevin R. Ryan, Mahmud Ahmed's itinerary from his Washington DC visit the week of 9/11, 11/27/2009,
The agreement between LLNL and Savannah River can be found here -
Savannah's reference to developing sol-gels can be found here -
SEC document for Washington pre-payments -
The Ties That Bind, Descended from family business empires,
six huge business groups dominate the Japanese economy,
Multinational Monitor, October 1983 -
Securacomm Consulting Inc. v. Securacom Incorporated,
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit,
 January 20, 1999, 49 U.S.P.Q.2d 1444; 166 F.3d 182,
Wikipedia page for Stratesec,
SEC filing for Stratesec, May 2, 1997,
Kroll Inc website,
23: news: Dimitri Khalezov`The Third Truth

youtube suggests
9/11: The Third Truth - Dimitri Khalezov (1of2 Full)

[. seeing the link to text of this interview,
it is over the top, and like just an insult ..]
Amazing interview with Dimitri Khalezov,
former Nuclear Intelligence officer of the Soviet Union.
Because of the Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Treaty of 1976
between the USA and the former USSR
and Dimitri's military role in the USSR's Nuclear Intelligence division,
Dimitri had certain knowledge of the WTC demolition schema,
which was required to obtain the original WTC building permit in New York
(i.e. NY did not issue a building permit without submitting a demolition schema).
Dimitri uses his insider information combined with his military background
to explain the events of 911 in depth. He leaves no 911 question unanswered.

In Part 1, Dimitri explains:
- Dimitri Khalezov background
- Planes and explosions
- Pentagon mentioned (explained fully in Part 2)
- Nuclear detonations explained
- WTC1 & WTC2 nuclear demolition

Support Evidence for Dimitri's Testimony
Nuclear Demolition
    This article is based on one by the same name
that appeared on Wikipedia in March 2010,
which was quickly removed.
It is largely the work of Dimitri Khalezov.
The heavily Russian Language influenced grammar of the original
has been improved but every effort has been made to retain its precise meaning.
There are also a few minor additions.
The article needs general tidying up and additional references provided.
11.24: news: 911u.org
Morally, a philosopher who uses his professional competence for anything
except a disinterested search for truth is guilty of a kind of treachery.
   - Bertrand Russell
There can be no liberty for a community which lacks
the information to detect lies.
   - journalist and social philosopher Walter Lippmann, 1919
Ignorance is an evil weed, which dictators may cultivate among
their dupes, but which no democracy can afford among its citizens.
   - William H. Beveridge, 1944
To understand 9/11 is to understand much.   [scroll down for more info]
   - 911 University, 2004
12.12: summary of the media bluepill theory:
. the 911bluepill refers to telling yourself
that what you saw didn't really happen
(it just looked like a nuke with thermite cutters;
it was actually the jet pancaking hot steel).
. the other bluepill theory (described next)
is that what you saw was simulated
after the mass media got hijacked
and the real news got e-bombed .
. reading about e-bomb's from these
media bluepill theorists
helped me formulate my NDEW theory
(Nuclear Directed Energy Weapon);
and, understand how a military program
could generate RF rays for Hutchison effects .

11.24: news: the media bluepill theory:
. all the news was computer-generated fabrications?
important electronics-related disruptions were reported!
http://www.septemberclues.info/
[25:
. the main use of DEW that day,
may have been simply to control media about it ?
. most likely local police were assuming this was
part of a terrorist conspiracy,
and that there could be agents on the ground
who could be coordinating bomb activity via cell phone;
thus, the first thing to do
is to control is all cell communications;
this would only coincidentally prevent all media .]

. there's a forum to discuss such blue pill theories .
http://www.cluesforum.info/
. next are some details about the tech involved .
EMP/HERF weapons and e-bombs:
[!] 24: news: EMP/HERF weapons and e-bombs

11.30: news: cognitive infiltration of and by 911Truthers:

comments to 9/11 Hypothesis:
AE911Truth, NIST, & Judy Wood

youtube.com/all_comments?v=qK2NT-udlGc
co.youtube#WhatsReallyGoingOnUS says:
Judy Wood and her [ClassifiedWeapons] theory
are brought to you by Cass Sunstein
and the Office of Disinformation.
web:
"Conspiracy Theories" and government infiltration
Sunstein with Adrian Vermeule co-authored
"Conspiracy Theories (2008),"
dealing with the risks and possible government responses
to false conspiracy theories resulting from
"cascades" of faulty information within groups that
may ultimately lead to violence.
In this article they wrote, "The existence of
both domestic and foreign conspiracy theories,
we suggest, is no trivial matter,
posing real risks to the government’s antiterrorism policies,
whatever the latter may be." They go on to propose that,
"the best response consists in
cognitive infiltration of extremist groups",
where they suggest, among other tactics,
"Government agents might enter chat rooms,
online social networks, or even real-space groups
and attempt to undermine percolating conspiracy theories
by raising doubts about their factual premises,
causal logic or implications for political action."
They also suggest responses:
"We can readily imagine a series of possible responses.
(1) Government might ban conspiracy theorizing.
(2) Government might impose some kind of tax,
financial or otherwise, on those who
disseminate such theories."
Sunstein and Vermeule also analyze the practice of
recruiting "nongovernmental officials";
they suggest that "government can supply these
independent experts with information
and perhaps prod them into action
from behind the scenes,"
further warning that "too close a connection
will be self-defeating if it is exposed."
Sunstein and Vermeule argue that
"credible independent experts offer the rebuttal,
rather than government officials themselves.
There is, however,
a tradeoff between credibility and control.
The price of credibility is that government cannot be
seen to control the independent experts."
co.youtube#EndTheFed59:

> Judy Wood and her theory are brought to you by Cass
> Sunstein and the Office of Disinformation.
my reply:
but isn't your claim baseless ?
Wood can't be disinformation because
her theory simply tries to account for
all the symptoms:
ie, clean nuclear accounts for
the seen pyroclastics,
. nuclear as driving RF in nearing storm's static field
can account for the seen hutchison effects;
but military thermate alone
does not explain either pyroclastics or hutchison effects .

EndTheFed59:
Recent research has shown that empirical evidence for
globalization of corporate innovation is very limited,
as a corollary
the market for technologies is shrinking.
Nick Knack paddy whack, pyroclastic doohickey
smish smack with a laser sack.
All you cog inf douchebags
will swing alongside the actual culprits.
my reply to EndTheFed59:
"(All you cog inf douchebags
will swing alongside the actual culprits.)?
I'm having trouble reading that;
but if you( EndTheFed59 ) think I'm
in the same class as  Cass Sunstein
( someone engaging in
cognitive infiltration of extremist groups );
what do you suppose my motivation is?
"(swing alongside the actual culprits.)?
what makes you think I'm not "(actual)?

11.15: other voices for controlled demolition:

Tower 7 blasted into rubble from NEW angle!
You can see the puffs of smoke in a vertical line
along the right side of the building.............
[. shows Larry Silverstein telling about
at least one controlled demolition that day,
ready to go on a moment's notice,
along with evidences of timed explosives
consistent with the nanothermite theory .]
Larry Silverstein"(just pull it):
leaseholder of twin towers suggests controlled demolition:Larry Silverstein said that WTC7 was"pulled", intentionally demolished:
I remember getting a call from the
fire department commander,
telling me that they were not sure they were
gonna be able to contain the fire,
and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life,
maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it."
And they made that decision to pull
and we watched the building collapse.

If WTC7 was wired up with explosives,
then why not the other towers? Our take...
Alex Jones has just one of the takes on this story:
"( Larry Silverstein, the owner of the WTC complex,
admitted on a September 2002 PBS documentary,
'America Rebuilds'
that he and the NYFD decided to
'pull' WTC 7 on the day of the attack.
The word 'pull' is industry jargon for
taking a building down with explosives...
We know that the term 'pull it' means to
bring the building down by means of explosives
because in the same documentary
a cleanup worker (in December 2001)
refers to the demolition of WTC Building 6
when he says,
"...we're getting ready to pull the building six.") .
Explosives have also been reported by firemen:
(current version of that source)
Firemen Louie Cacchioli:
    "I was taking firefighters up in the elevator to the 24th floor
    to get in position to evacuate workers.
    On the last trip up a bomb went off.
    We think there were bombs set in the building." (notice the 'we')

A group of firemen in the documentary ‘911 – the filmmakers’:
Fireman one:
"We made it at least two blocks and we started running.
    Floor by floor it started popping out."
Fireman two: (makes sound and hand gestures
to show how the floors popped out):
    "It is if they had detonators..."
Fireman one: "Yeah! detonators..."
Fireman two:
"It is if they had planned to take down the building
…boom…boom …boom…boom”
Fireman one:
"Yeah...detonators... all the way down,
I watching it and running."
Fireman three: "Right, just ran up west."
Fireman one:
"And then you saw this cloud of
[shush-it] chasing you down the road."
In June of 2002 some transcripts of the firemen at the scene:
    ”Official: Battalion 3 to dispatch, we've just had another explosion.”
    “Official: Battalion 3 to dispatch, we've had additional explosion.”
    “Dispatcher: Received battalion command. Additional explosion.”

Another live transcript:
    "We have numerous people covered in dust
    because of the secondary explosion..."
NBC reporter Pat Dawson at the morning of 911:
    ”...The Chief of Safety [Albert Turi]
    of the Fire Department of New York
    told me that...er...he thinks that
    there were actually devices that were
    planted in the building.
    One of the secondary devices he thinks that took place
    after the initial impact was, he thinks,
    may have been on the plane
    that crashed into one of the towers.
    The second device, he thinks, he speculates,
    was probably planted in the building…
Randy Lavello article 2003:
    "Before beginning this article, I met Auxiliary Lieutenant Fireman
    and former Auxiliary Police Officer, Paul Isaac Jr.
    at the World Trade Center Memorial.
    Paul, along with many other firemen,
    is very upset about the obvious cover-up
    and he is on a crusade for answers and justice.
    He was stationed at Engine 10,
    across the street from the World Trade Center in 1998 and 99;
    Engine 10 was entirely wiped out
    in the destruction of the towers.
    He explained to me that,
    “many other firemen know there were
    bombs in the buildings,
    but they’re afraid for their jobs to admit it
    because the ‘higher-ups’ forbid discussion of this fact.”
    Paul further elaborated that
    former CIA director Robert [James] Woolsey,
    as the Fire Department’s Anti-terrorism Consultant,
    is sending a gag order down the ranks.
    “There were definitely bombs in those buildings,”
    he told me. He explained to me that,
    if the building had ‘pancaked’ as it’s been called,
    the falling floors would have met great resistance from
    the steel support columns, which would have
    sent debris flying outward into the surrounding blocks.
    I asked him about the trusses,
    and quoted the history channel’s
    ‘don’t trust a truss’ explanation for the collapses.
    He responded in disbelief, and told me,
    “You could never build a truss building that high.
    A slight wind would knock it over!
    Those buildings were supported by reinforced steel.
    Building don’t just implode like that;
    this was a demolition.”
11.23: web:
site:WHATIS-THEPLAN.ORG
Ex-MI5 Annie Machon on 9-11 Truth
Leaked 9 11 Video Shot From NYPD Helicopter

This is a ' MUST SEE' 9/11 story
[composite of some documentaries, funny,
seems to show how military thermite could work .]
9/11, pilots say "NO WAY"!
CIA WhistleBlower EXPOSES Everything! "Extreme Prejudice"
. Former CIA Asset, Susan Lindauer, provides an extraordinary first-hand account
from behind the intelligence curtain
that shatters the government's lies about 9/11 and Iraq,
and casts a harsh spotlight on the workings of the Patriot Act as the ideal weapon to
bludgeon whistle blowers and dissidents.
A terrifying true story of "black budget" betrayals and the Patriot Act,
with its arsenal of secret evidence,
indefinite detention and threats of forcible drugging,
. EXTREME PREJUDICE(Book by Susan Lindauer)
reveals one Asset's desperate struggle to survive the brutal cover ups of 9/11 and Iraq.
EXTREME PREJUDICE delivers a
high tension expose of the real facts surrounding
the CIA's advance warnings of 9/11
and Iraq's contributions to the 9/11 investigation.
Further Review and link to the book .

cia-pull says obama is
not helping mideast peace:
9/11 Whistleblower Susan Lindauer:
'Libyan Opposition Is Al-Qaeda'
NATO Working With Al CIAeda!
 Jun 30, 2011
RT - With bin Laden's elimination,
the US announced a withdrawal of
troops from Afghanistan.
Now President Obama has revealed a
new national strategy for counterterrorism.
. The focus is al-Qaeda and it's affiliates,
as well as Iran, Syria, Hezbollah
and Hamas on the list of enemies.
. Susan Lindauer, former CIA asset
who covered Libya for nearly 10 years,
is speaking to RT on what that exactly means.
. NATO & Al-Qaeda War Crimes In Libya
---
this is why they were so sure the vid riot was terrorism .
kadaffi is a socialist against sharia law
and helps women,
I thought it was obvious though
that he was promoting democracy,
even if it meant sharia law .

this is kevin barret's show
. here he is on tube:
. another guest with 911 red herring conspiracy,
this is the cia pull .
Susan Lindauer, author of Extreme Prejudice, is the first CIA asset
to have spoken out, under her own name and for the record,
on Israeli complicity in 9/11,
the controlled demolition of the World Trade Center,
and the specific, detailed foreknowledge of the
time, target, and means of the 9/11 attacks
held throughout the months prior to 9/11 by the CIA in general
and Lindauer's CIA handler, Richard Fuisz, in particular.
She has also exposed her first-hand knowledge of pre-war intelligence
and negotiations showing that Iraq was willing to
give the US "anything it asked"
and that the war was therefore--from the perspective of US interests--
not only utterly unnecessary, but wildly counter-productive.
Lindauer's evidence points strongly to 9/11 being a
coup d'etat by hard-line Zionists determined to
steer the US into a self-destructive war on Israel's enemies.
Paul Joseph Watson May 26, 2010
from PropagandaMatrix Website
Veteran Middle East correspondent Alan Hart:
Largest engineering firm studied collapse of twin towers
and said there was no doubt it was a controlled explosion .
Middle East expert and former BBC presenter Alan Hart:
Speaking on the Kevin Barrett show
yesterday, [today= May 26, 2010]
Hart said he thought the 9/11 attack
probably started as a Muslim operation
headed up by Osama Bin Laden
but that the plot was subsequently hijacked
and carried out by Mossad agents
in collusion with elements of the CIA,
adding that since its formation,
Israel has penetrated every Arab government and terrorist organization.
    "My guess is that at an early point they said to the bad guys in the CIA
    - hey this operation's running what do we do,
    and the zionists and the neo-cons said let's use it,"
    said Hart, making reference to how top neo-cons
    like Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz and their fellow
    Project For a New American Century authors
    had called for a "catastrophic and catalyzing event
    - like a new Pearl Harbor," the year before 9/11.

    "The twin towers were brought down by a controlled ground explosion,
    not the planes," said Hart,
    adding that this view was based on his close friendship with
    consultants who work with the world's leading
    civil engineering and construction firm.
Hart asked the company to study the collapse of the twin towers,
after which they told him directly,
    "There's absolutely no doubt whatsoever that the towers were
    brought down by a controlled ground explosion."
9-11: Jim Fetzer, False Flag Terror and The Rise of the Global Police State

the other prof.truther, steven jones, is a dr.physics,
he seems less angry than fetzer;
maybe he's been doing less front-line time .

11.23: co.fb: BEST 9-11 DOCUMENTARY EVER!:
. notice the title, that's a modest title .
BEST 9/11 DOCUMENTARY EVER!(FULL MOVIE)
ZERO HOUR BEST 9 11 DOCUMENTARY EVER!(FULL MOVIE)

23: here is fetzer:
fetzer says the hijackers are fake:
pentagon didn't get hit by a jet survivor believes;

James Fetzer`Possible False Flag - Camelot Whistleblower Radio
dr.hist and phi of sci,
. his active blog .

cannonfire.blogspot.com/2006/03/controlled-demolitions-last-word-i.html
 There is a lot of buzz here in NYC, because major local media are actually beginning to take 9/11 truth issues seriously. A few weeks ago, the Village Voice, perhaps the premiere alt weekly in the nation, devoted a cover and several articles to it, here:
And a few days ago, just as Charlie was making his comments,
New York Magazine, a thorougly mainstream rag,
ran a respectful 9/11 truth piece -- most importantly
written by a reporter who was at ground zero on 9/11
and has been mystified ever since about the collapse of WTC7:
http://nymag.com/news/features/16464/

One of the most chilling parts of the piece
is his first hand recollection concerning WTC 7 .
William Rodriguez,
On 9/11, William was late.
Instead of mopping the stairwells on the 110th floor,
where he almost certainly would have died,
he was chatting with the maintenance crew
on level B-1 in the basement.
“I heard this massive explosion below, on level B-2 or 3.
I saw this guy come up the stairs.
The skin on his arms was peeled away . . . hanging.
Then I heard another explosion, from above.
That was the first plane, hitting the building.”
In possession of one of the few master keys in the building,
William led firemen up the stairwells.
He was responsible for getting at least a dozen people out of the towers.
Trying to escape as the North Tower fell,
he found himself beneath a half-buried fire engine.
“I told myself this is going to be a slow death,
but I should make it last as long as I could.
My training as an escape artist helped me.
I knew to be calm. They found me just in time.
I understood my whole life had been pointing to this moment.”
Acclaimed as “the last man pulled from the rubble,”
William became a hero of 9/11. “I was at the White House.
They took my picture with President Bush.”
Four years later, after repeatedly being
rebuffed in his attempts to tell officials
his story about the basement explosion,
William is suing the U.S. government under the rico statute,
legislation drafted to prosecute Mafia families.
The suit reads like an Air America wet dream,
with Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Condoleezza Rice,
John Ashcroft, George Tenet, Karl Rove,
and others (the Diebold Company is thrown in for good measure)
listed as defendants.
nymag.com/news/features/16464/index5.html
Steven E. Jones, a physics professor from
Brigham Young University, in front of Dr. Sunder.
Jones makes the case for controlled demolition,
claiming the persistence of “molten metal” at ground zero
indicates the likely presence of “high-temperature cutter-charges
. . . routinely used to melt/cut/demolish steel.”
Can 49.3 Percent of the People Be Crazy?
Late in the summer of 2004,
as the Republicans in Madison Square Garden
extolled George Bush’s staunch protection of the homeland,
a Zogby poll asked New Yorkers
if they believed that “some of our leaders knew in advance
attacks were planned on or around September 11, 2001,
and consciously failed to act.”
Of city residents, 49.3 percent said yes.
A year and a half later, doubt had increased,
at least according to my own informal canvassing.
Per Nick Levis’s “HOP” paper, I offered four choices:
(A) the Official Story;
(B) the Official Story plus incompetence;
(C) LIHOP; [Let It Happen on Purpose]
(D) MIHOP. [Made It Happen on Purpose]
Of the 56 respondents, 28 said C, 23 picked B,
with 4 (including two Muslim cabdrivers)
opting for MIHOP.
Only one person picked A, the official story.
This was a fireman, who was smoking a cigarette
outside a downtown engine company.
Truth be told, I wasn’t keen on
quizzing firemen about 9/11 Truth,
but I knew the guy’s brother from high school.
“Not answering that,” he said,
warning not to ask others in the company,
which had lost men on 9/11.
This didn’t mean he wasn’t of the opinion that
if he lived to be a million he’d never “see
anything as corrupt, bullshit, and sad
as what happened at the WTC.
They got their gold
and shipped us to Fresh Kills,”
he said.
Call it one more conspiracy theory,
but many uniformed firefighters
believe the powers that be
cared more about finding the gold reserves
held in vaults beneath the Trade Center
than the bodies of their fallen brothers.
Still, the fireman said,
if he had to pick [, he'd agree with the Official Story;]
“Osama 'ing bin Laden, like Bush says.
If I thought it was someone else,
then I’d have to do something about it.
And I don’t want to think about what I’d do.”
11.23:
a 9-11 encyclopedia:

wiki has a news channel:

wikispooks is for anti-zionist ideas wiki won't tolerate:
wikispooks/controlled demolition on 9-11:
controlled demolition generally .

recommended readings by a
controlled demoliton theory defender:
faketerror.blogspot.com/


Dr. David Ray Griffin
9/11 and the American Empire: How Should Religious People Respond?
Significant Pattern to 9/11 Report's Omissions & Distortions
The 9/11 Commission Report: A 571-Page Lie
The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True
Explosive Testimony:Revelations about the Twin Towers in the 9/11 Oral Histories
 911truth.org 26jan2006
mindfully.org/Reform/2006/911-WTC-Twin-Towers26jan06.htm
Flights 11, 175, 77, and 93: The 9/11 Commission's Incredible Tales


Possible Motives Of The Bush Administration

cannonfire.blogspot.com/2006/03/controlled-demolitions-last-word-i.html
# how does the standard story accounts for
the antenna, attached to the core, beginning to move downward
as soon as the collapse began.
How can the standard story explain the topmost 20 floors or so,
tipping over sideways (as shown in the photos),
not landing well outside the footprint of the building,
but instead being pulverized to dust IN THE AIR.
Are there any of the alleged mechanisms that can yield '
a near-free fall time for the collapse of the buildings,
even though they would have been falling through
redundantly strong steel and concrete floors below?
#  It should be noted that many birds were killed with that one stone,
not the least of which was
what WERE the Rockefeller boys going to do with
that white elephant project,
as more and more tenants left,
and the study (still in the public domain!)
for either retrofitting or demolishing the site
showed an extreme cost into the billions
to handle the asbestos problem
in an environmentally sound and legally mandated fashion.
# Tom Tvedten MD
 the Twin Towers was a white elephant
 and a money loser for the Port Authority
 and was about to cost them an extra billion dollars
 to come into complience with the asbestos codes
 of the city, state, and nation.
 Many floors were vacant and other tenants had plans to leave.
 The idea of demolition had been considered by the Port Authority
 but a stick by stick demolition would have been necessary
 and very cost prhibitive.
 How convienient that a personal friend of Ariel Sharron and Ben Netanyahu
 would gain control of the buildings and get them insured against terrorist attack
 for the first time in their history
 just a few short weeks before their
 demolition(Oops, I mean collapse.)
 giving them just enough time to
 set the charges necessary to bring the structures down.
 How to explain the molten iron in the basements?
 How to explain the pulveerization of the non-metalic solids
 that made up the buildings?
 How to explain the fact that over half of the weight
 of the noncombustible contents of the buildings
 were pulverized and not accounted for at the site of the clean-up?
 They weren't hauled off to Fresh Kills
 and weren't sold as scrap to China and the like.
 They were pulverized into dust and,
 as Governor Pataki said, Spread across Manhattan.
 How to explain the bone fragments
 on top of the Deutsche Bank Bldg.
 that were no more than slivers?
 What mechanism other than massive exlosion
 could explain the fragmentation of these human remains
 that had been part of intact beings prior to the "collapse" of the buildings.
 How to explain the lack of intact though crushed
 office furniture, computers, filing cabinets,
elevators, waterfountains, toilets, sinks,
 not to mention people (over 1,000 still missing) sandwiched between the
 "pancaked" floors like the filling in some macabre Dagwood sandwich,
 as the NIST Report would have us believe happened?
 And, one last question, why do you who have
 obviously studied the question
 in greater depth and detail than most
 continue to promote any theory at all other than
 the theory of controled demolition,
 recognizing that without a legitimate
criminal investigation into the matter
 all theories are just that, theories,
 and the best one yet to fit the data is without a doubt
 the theory of controled demolition?
 I leave with a quote from Macbeth
 " I begin to doubt the equivocation of the fiend
 that lies like truth."
23: web: bibliotecapleyades.net`sociopolitica:

Ed Ward, MD
 For months we witnessed trucks coming and going from Ground Zero
 and the media told us they were hauling away the steel.
       What steel? There was very little steel left in the rubble
       because it had been pulverized into nano-dust.
       So what were these trucks really hauling back and forth? Dirt!
       They hauled in dirt, spread it all over Ground Zero,
       then scooped it up and hauled it away, and this went on for years.
       Didn’t they do that at Chernobyl? Yes they did!
So now you know what didn’t cause the buildings to “vanish.”
Planes, jet fuel and thermite are irrelevant.
So,
        What kind of unconventional energy could have caused the Twin Towers to turn to dust?
        A fissionless fusion thermo nuclear event?
        Direct Energy Weapons?
        HAARP?
        A scaled up weaponized version of The Hutchison Effect?
The investigation continues…
911 Related Articles - Chronological:
Bombs in the WTC Buildings Proves Nothing to Racist-Fascist Bigots
Micro-Nukes at the WTC
Update: Micro-Nukes at the WTC
http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/07/03/05/ward.htm
Update: Proves Micro Nukes in the WTC
http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/07/04/16/ward.htm
Verifying the Source of WTC Tritium Levels that Are 55
Times "Background Levels" http://www.rense.com/general76/wtc.htm
Prof. Jones Denies, Ignores, Misrepresents Proven Tritium Levels 55
Times Background Levels http://www.rense.com/general77/levels.htm
Steven Jones Replies To Dr. Ed Ward
http://www.rense.com/general77/ward.htm
Prof Jones Gladly Assists Testing Unaffected WTC Items
http://www.rense.com/general77/profjh.htm
Vancouver Conference: Drs Deagle and Jones debate Micro Nukes in the
WTC http://www.911blogger.com/node/9590
9/11 Sicknesses consistent with environmental radiation contamination
http://www.agoracosmopolitan.com/home/Frontpage/2007/06/22/01625.html
Articles referencing my micro nukes articles.
Ted Twietmeyer's excellent article on EMP effects: What May Have
Melted the WTC Vehicles.
Jerry Mazza's insights on 911 and current political scams: Ground
Zero Illnesses Come Back to Haunt Giuliani.
11.24: web: Ed Ward, MD:
site:bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica " Ed Ward, MD"
    Pictures Prove Mini Nukes Caused 9-11 Devastation
    www.bibliotecapleyades.net/.../esp_sociopol_911_170.htm
    Sep 18, 2010 – by Dr. Ed Ward, MD. September 9, 2010.
    from PakAlertPress Website.
    The Current Irrefutable Conclusion:
    Treason. Murder and Crimes Against ...

Re-Exploding The WTC Nuclear Demolition 'Myth' - The Mysterious ...
by Andrew Johnson May 19, 2010
UPDATED 20th May 2010 - WITH RESPONSE FROM DIMITRI @  CheckTheEvidence
    May 19, 2010 – Also, do you have any connection or have you communicated at all with Ed Ward MD.
    In relation to the WTC destruction, 40+ points of ...
Recently, much exposure has been given to Dimitri Khalezov
and his detailed presentation about the supposed
“nuclear demolition” of the WTC buildings on 9/11.
A number of websites seem to be linked to this:
http://www.3truth911.com
http://www.911thology.cn/
http://www.nuclear-demolition.com/
Dmitri also has a YouTube channel:
http://www.youtube.com/user/911thology
. he also been posting on the GLP forum
 http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message1029915/pg19

Sadly, Dimitri cannot explain the available evidence
concerning what actually happened at the WTC on 9/11.
I have written about this quite some time ago,
though Dimitri claims (see below) that the nuclear device was positioned 77 meters below ground
and spends quite some time explaining why the normal nuclear effects,
which I and others have pointed out, were not seen or not obvious.
One problem is that, he cannot explain
why the WTC bathtub was undamaged
(except with very precise positioning of the nuke (how, exactly?)
Once again, people I know seem to have “fallen” for this new posting
as if it is some kind of super-duper new explanation
– when in reality it is not. Please see below for:
Dmitri cannot explain
.. the silent disappearance of the WTC.
Look at his diagram of a "nuclear furnace"
created beneath the WTC which it "melted down into"!
This is pure nonsense! We saw the steel turning to dust!!

Dimitri explains DEW evidence as planted to frame bin Ladin:

Regarding cars [being apparently burned by DEW tech],
The problem is that the 3 WTC buildings was demolished by
150 kiloton (3ps) underground nuclear explosions
with hypocenters located 77 meters below the ground surface.
In this situation
no thermal radiation would be available to
half-burn cars in typically 'atomic' manner
(typical for atmospheric nuclear explosions).
However, some cars in the immediate vicinity
came into some high temperatures
and were somehow either burned or even melted.
But this by no means would be a kind of 'half-burns'
- typical to atmospheric nuclear explosions.
So, after they demolished the WTC
with their own 150 kiloton nukes,
the U.S. officials did not know how to explain it to public
- so they attempted to blame it on
alleged 3 mini-nukes Soviet made
- that Osama bought from Ukraine [blackmarket]
and planted in the Towers' basements.
So, in order to support further this version, ...
This is planted evidence - no different than
'landing gear' of 'planes' or a 'passport' of alleged hijackers.
Simply don't pay attention to it.
[24: but they weren't trying to pass on that story!
it was supposed to be effects of jet-burned building .]

 24: levitated without being burned/Hutchison effects via nuke?
what about people levitated without being burned?:
. after Dimitri(Mar 31, 2010)
explains the limits of his qualifications,
in regard to DEW evidence at 9/11,
my own theory suddenly integrated
with his theory of a nuclear demolition:
. the hutchison effects really happened by accident;
if you do set off a nuke in a storm,
what you have done is mixed RF in a static field .
pos: levitated without being burned/need to study nuke theory more:
. but what about evidence of military thermites?
is there consistency ?
I still need a lot more time with the nuke theory .

 . bibliotecapleyades's hutchison effects link .

checktheevidence responds to 911thology invitation:

I am intrigued to know if [your vid] addresses
these basic points of evidence, discussed here,
in this e-mail exchange: [next paragraph]
Also, have you communicated at all with Dr. Ed Ward, MD.
In relation to the WTC destruction,
40+ points of explanation need to be addressed:
Finally, what legal or similar challenges
will you or your associates
be making or initiating based on what you know?

Problems with the "Nuke" Theory of WTC Demolition:

A number of people strongly state that nuclear explosives
destroyed the WTC complex.
People who have looked at other articles on this site
will understand that this theory alone
cannot explain all the evidence at the WTC.
I highlighted the problems with the Nuke theory
in an exchange I had with Ed Ward, MD.
His responses were interesting.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Ward, MD
Sent: 16 February 2008 11:41
To: Chris North;
Subject: Re: [Fwd:
Germany becomes the First Country to
admit Clandestine Chemtrails Operations]

Chris you give great Mormon.
But, you are way off on Wood - head.

Dr. Judy Wood - head of the still unamed DEW crew

According to Dr. Wood, some unamed Direct Energy Weapon
can be the only cause of the WTC demolition.
According to Dr. Wood, the evidence is overwhelming for DEW weaponry.
The only thing lacking appears to be exactly which DEW was used.
The 'evidence' bounces between microwaves, lasers, and lately even a Tesla DEW,
Or, was it a combo since she has different DEWS doing different aspect of the debris.
Dr. Wood has also not noted
how these/this/combo managed to work unseen
in 5 acres of a 1/2 million pounds of dust - minimum.

The Wood 'evidence' somehow consists of selected applications for one method
and possibly a combination DEW weapon.
The mere mention of any type of possible DEW weapon becomes proof that it exists.
Indeed, some of the DEW weapons do actually exist and are proven fact.
The problem is that NONE of these supposed DEWs exist at
anywhere near the size and power needed to turn
3 billion pounds of building into 2 billion pounds of dust.
Which is not to say they don't exist,
I'm sure some of them do exist on the scale needed for the WTC,
HOWEVER, THESE ARE MASSIVE FINELY TUNED MACHINES
DEFINITELY NOTHING THAT IS PORTABLE.
These massive DEWs require MEGAWATTS of power,
but no need to worry about that either.
Indeed, some of these DEWS could produce the specifically quoted effect,
HOWEVER THEIR METHOD OF ACTION
IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH ALL OF THE EVIDENCE
AND THEIR APPLICATION/EFFECT
ARE NEVER APPLIED TO THE CIRCUMSTANCES/EFFECTS
THAT ACTUALLY OCCURED DURING THE DEMOLITION.
Ed Ward, MD

-----Original Message----- From: Andrew Johnson
Dear Mr Ward,

As you copied me in on your response, I feel duty bound to respond.

There is, it seems,
to a co-ordinated and deliberate effort to
obfuscate the truth about what happened at the WTC,
with various people stepping up to the plate to present or even "push" theories
which only explain a limited set of evidence.

The best theories explain the most evidence - and this applies to
both physical evidence and circumstantial evidence.
I can confidently say that Dr Wood's study
and general conclusion explain the most evidence of any set of theories out there.
Additionally, Dr Wood's background is the most suitable of
any of the people that have "stepped out of the box"
to deal with 9/11 issues.

The problems with both the Thermite theory
and the "Nuke" theory are that they cannot explain
any of the evidence listed below.
1) There were no really bright flashes as the towers turned to dust.
2) There were no loud explosions as the towers turned to dust.
3) There was little or no heat in the dust cloud.
4) To my knowledge, there is no publicly viewable research
on small, concealable nuclear explosives.
5) Nuclear explosives cannot account for the
24-foot circular holes seen in the buildings
and in the street.
6) The nuke or "large explosive/incendiary"
does not explain the flipped cars and vehicles.

So, for those saying nuke explosions did it,
they aren't like any other type of nuke seen
- they are almost silent, give off no light and no heat.

My view on the nuke theory is also strongly affected by the, at times,
laughable discussion between Bill Deagle (MD)
and Prof Steven E Jones.
Even though I am only a lowly graduate of Computer Science and Physics,
I was extremely skeptical about
some of their factual knowledge,
such as that of Isotopes.
I took the trouble to transcribe
this incredible .mp3 discussion .
[summary:
. neither Jones or Deagle are being completely honest;
You will hear them:
    Claiming to be discussing the evidence,
    but in reality they don’t discuss much evidence at all.
    Jones suggesting that if there is a nuke-attack,
    9-11 truthers should get dust samples
    and send them to Deagle or Jones.
    [.. but,
    he is sarcastically refering to
    dust samples that were actually sent by victims,
    showing only proof of military thermites .
    ]
    Jones gets Deagle to agree that the evidence of
    no planes hitting the WTC towers is “ridiculous”.
    Jones mentions WTC Iron quite a few times.
    Both Jones and Deagle talk about an Isotope of Iodine 110
    – but this is extremely obscure (the stable Isotope of Iodine is 127).
]-summary
Where the nukers have some credibility
is in the idea of a NUCLEAR PROCESS.
We believe we know what this now is
- and it's related to cold fusion.
I think that's why Steve Jones is involved in all this
(to help cover that up, by knowing
which key evidence attention needs to be
diverted from).
[... but,
he might also merely trying to defend
a conventional reputation that must assert
cold fusion is a hoax .]
Now that we have tied the evidence in with
the Hutchison effect,
I would say we can explain much more of the data
better than anyone else.
If one is to be considered a credible scientist and researcher,
surely one must consider ALL the evidence,
not just "cherry pick" what "looks good".
In your writings, you seem to have repeatedly done this,
which gives me cause for concern.

Everyone knows of my own support for
Dr Wood and that of Dr Reynolds.
Morgan Reynold @ nomoregames.net

    According to Dr. Wood, some unamed
    Direct Energy Weapon can be
    the only cause of the WTC demolition. 

    According to Dr. Wood, the evidence is
overwhelming for DEW weaponry.
The only thing lacking appears to be
exactly which DEW was used.
The 'evidence' bounces between microwaves, lasers,
and lately even a Tesla DEW,
Or, was it a combo since she has different DEWS
doing different aspect of the debris.
[24.1459:
. this again reminds of the theory
that the Hutchison effects could be accidental,
products of the nukes within the static field
of the approaching hurricane .]

Dr. Wood has also not noted how these/this/combo
managed to work unseen in 5 acres of a
1/2 million pounds of dust - minimum.

I think you'll find that Dr Wood deliberately kept the definition
fairly loose "Energy which is directed".
The Hutchison Effect fits this description well.

The WTC evidence is suggestive of a combination of technologies
- the circular holes are suggestive of a directed beam of some kind,
but the "random effects" tie up with Hutchison effect technology.
Nevertheless, Hutchison does have samples with
relatively circular holes too.

    The Wood 'evidence' somehow consists of selected applications
    for one method and possibly a combination DEW weapon.

As you mention below, we know that certain types of
DEW weapons such as MTHEL and ABL already exist .

     Indeed, some of the DEW weapons do actually exist
and are proven fact.
The problem is that NONE of these supposed DEWs
exist at anywhere near the size and power needed to turn
3 billion pounds of building into 2 billion pounds of dust. 

You are talking about "White World" technology.
I would strongly suggest that we should be talking about
"black world" technology
- as I have been saying for over 12 months.

     Which is not to say they don't exist,
I'm sure some of them do exist on the scale needed for the WTC,
HOWEVER, THESE ARE MASSIVE FINELY TUNED MACHINES
DEFINITELY NOTHING THAT IS PORTABLE.
These massive DEWs require MEGAWATTS of power,
but no need to worry about that either.

You seem to know quite a bit about the types of weapons available.
Here, also, you give a good example of ignoring evidence.
In our radio broadcast with John Hutchison,
we described how we thought the process which destroyed the WTC
used energy ALREADY IN the crystal lattice of the material concerned.
Here's a link for you - our explanation is about 5 minutes long:
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-1570615667754851772#00h30m10s

Admittedly, I would describe this presentation as a little "rough and ready",
being done "off the cuff" and unrehearsed
and we only have our own personal resources
and the help of friends like Ambrose Lane and Frank Ferguson
to make this stuff happen.

    Indeed, some of these DEWS could produce the specifically quoted effect,
HOWEVER THEIR METHOD OF ACTION
IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH ALL OF THE EVIDENCE
AND THEIR APPLICATION/EFFECT ARE NEVER APPLIED TO THE CIRCUMSTANCES/
EFFECTS THAT ACTUALLY OCCURED DURING THE DEMOLITION. 
This statement is essentially false
- the Hutchison effects tie up very closely with those seen on 9/11
and, as we have documented,
those effects which seem to be ongoing to this day.

If I were you, I'd realise that there is now a "sea change"
and more and more people are going to realise how
free energy and the 9/11 are interwoven.
Tactics of deliberate obfuscation and confusion
(which is what seems to be going on)
aren't going to work much longer.
This particularly true where Dr Wood and I
have full transparency
and significant details about our background
are known or easily discovered.

Now, if you want to go on paying for Gas and polluting the atmosphere etc, it's your choice
- but it is now no longer mine and I would strongly suggest we
look to a future where the "black gold, stranglehold" scenario
is a thing of the past.
Andrew Johnson
UK
-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Ward, MD 17 February 2008 11:13

The size of the nuke inside walls and 5 acres of 1/2 million pounds of dust
more than allows for no bright flash.
And let's not ignore the heat,
true, all that lived only felt warmth BUT ALL FELT WARMTH
[or felt chemical burns vs heating]
and many picked up off their feet and thrown feet or yards.
[or levitated by Hutchison effects ]
Again, the referenced size of the nuke
easily allow it to satisfy all those conditions
- this is brought out in my first article
AND IS COMPLETE BS
in any one that actually read my
Micro Nuke articles.
The same blast of wind that threw people around
may well have done the cars they make no references
as to exact circumstances, just BS.
thank you,
Ed Ward, MD

Will the Joneses and 911 'Truth' Orgs
Ever Legitimately Address the Referenced, Verifiable,
Proven Facts that Are, In Total, Only Consistent With
Micro ThermoNuclear Usage
and which Have Never Been Noted
or Addressed on a Scientific Level?

Steven Jones, Alex Jones, 911 'Truthers' Orgs,
Still Seem to Be Denying, Misrepresenting
and Doing Their Best to Ignore
the Following Facts and More.
Why? This is a profound and crucial question.

* Ignore PROVEN DILUTED TRITIUM LEVELS
THAT ARE 55 TIMES NORMAL BACKGROUND
AND WOULD ACCOUNT FOR
BILLIONS OF TRITIUM UNITS UNDILUTED.

Does it have to be Trillions of Units to be 'significant'?
Is this fact some kind of Greek Mythology Method
and no longer available to the
self proclaimed New Scientific Method as a fact?
-- see Tritium Levels 55 Times (normal)
--. see thepriceofliberty.org/07/03/05/ward.htm

Dr.Ed Ward 2008`Thermate, C4, Nukes Prove 911 Was An Inside Job

* Still seem to be denying 3 Massive Craters:
(2 Craters 250 feet wide X 35 feet deep,
1 Crater (Middle of 8 story WTC 6) 120 feet wide and 45 feet deep?
Did Thermate also burn these massive craters into the ground
- yet somehow only caused 5 to 7 acres of
other land to seer at 2,000 degrees?

* Still seem to by denying, misrepresenting
5 to 7 acres of land at 2,000 degrees.
The inuendo from the 911 'Truthers' is that
''super thermate' (superdoubletopsecret thermate)
cut the girders (while somehow exploding),
burned cars, and then brought 6 acres of land and debris to 2,000 degrees F.
'Super thermate' burns at the rate of 350 meters a second.
To cut a steel beam in one spot requires significantly less than
350 meters of 'super thermate'.
The WTC took 12 seconds to fall.
In order for a single strip or a 350 meter cube to burn for 12 seconds
it would require a length of thermate 4,000 meters long.
Then after 4,000 Meters of thermate would have burned,
there was still more thermate that burned cars,
and also raised the temperature of 6 acres of land to 2,000 degrees?
How many Million 'insignificant' Meters of Thermate would that take?

* Still seem to be denying, misrepresenting,
wilting spires of 16 inch steel that withstood at least
1/2 Billion ('insignificant') pounds of building
and then suddenly went limp?
Was this 'invisible superdupertripletopsecret
thermate at work again?

* Still seem to be denying,
the virtually instant creation of 2 billion pounds of DUST?
(This is TWO-THIRDS of the total mass weight
of the towers). Did the 'superduperdoubletopsecret thermate'
turn this mass of structure into DUST?

* Still seem to be denying massive cancer
(and a huge spectrum of cancer)
in WTC responders and victims
while the only known cause of all of these cancers
is RADIATION and some of these cancers, such as testicular,
have virtually no known cause except radiation?

(Think DU in our service personnel in Iraq and Afghanistan
...not to mention the indigenous peoples.)

There are a LOT more WTC proven FACTS that,
in their totality, can ONLY occur because of
a Micro Thermonuclear blast.
However, I'm not going to waste my time
since I suspect they are still denying,
misrepresenting and doing their best to
ignore all the facts of their supposed New Scientific Method
that denies, misrepresents and ignores
Proven, Referenced, Reliable, Hardcore Scientific Data
under some pretext of the Greek Mythology Method.

Why haven't these proven facts been
noted and addressed on a scientific basis?
Why aren't they being openly discussed, EVER?

Eighteen months ago I published Micro Nukes in the WTC
- General Information on WTC Evidence and Background Micro Nukes.

Ten months ago - I published Update:
Micro Nukes in the WTC - Main Evidence - See: http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/07/03/05/ward.htm

Seven months ago - Prof. Jones
Denied, Ignored and Misrepresented
Proven Tritium Levels 55 Times Normal Background Levels.
Why did he do so?

Why will he not confront the SCIENTIFIC data
and seriously deal with it?
Ed Ward 2007` Prof. Jones Denies, Ignores Misrepresents
Proven Tritium Levels 55 Times Background Levels

Last week, I published Thermate, C4, Nukes Prove 911 Was An Inside Job.

This is a list of most of my recent papers in the long series of scientific material I have presented elaborately detailing the use of Micro Nukes at the WTC
...solid evidence that deserved open and public discourse in the 911 Truth movement
and especially through the platform of the Jones program and his multiple web sites.
In that Prof Jones refuses to discuss them,
one can only wonder about the 'openness' of his scientific mind.
. see: Thermate, C4, Nukes Prove 911 Was An Inside Job
Ed Ward, MD
The Bogus Science (BS) of 'Explosive SuperThermate'
vs The Facts of Deflagration.

"( . the process of demolition requires
cutting agents to cut the steel,
then explosives to move the cut pieces away from their support;
thermate is a cutting agent;
[. that is what the firemen heard going pop, pop, pop .]
If contact cutting agents produced a typical explosion',
it would blow away the cuttiing agent .
Professor Jones ... samples of the
molten steel from the twin towers.
... the bright yellow explosions and molten metal
... appear to be that of Thermite,
which is widely used in controlled demolition.
Low explosives deflagrate rather than detonate.)

The New Improved 'NWO' Ready and Waiting
Thanks to The People's Psuedo- Revolution (religious fanatics).
www.thepriceofliberty.org/ward.htm

Independent Writer/Investigative Reporter/Media Liaison for The Price of Liberty
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/
http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/arc_ward.htm

----- Original Message -----
From: Andrew Johnson To: Ed Ward, MD ; Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2008 5:23 AM
Dr Ward, To respond briefly:
    I never discussed the actual quantity of dust - it is only relevant when
    one considers the total energy requirements,
    which I discussed in terms of a cold fusion-like effect rather than a hot one.
    The idea of a virtually invisible nuclear explosion which is virtually silent
    is not supported by any evidence that I have seen.
    The tritium effects are also seen in cold fusion reactions, but attempts were made to cover these up.
    Dr Wood's study references this data on page 7. (Sorry, I forgot to mention this originally).
    The wind affecting the cars SELECTIVELY, is not supported by evidence - wind doesn't behave like this.
    We have video of the dust cloud and we know it was travelling at
    less than 100mph (perhaps more like 20 or 25 mph. Going by what Tornadoes do, I think winds well in excess of 100mph are required to flip cars.
11.24:  Dr Greg Jenkins Interviews Dr. Judy Wood
Wood-JenkinsInterview.pdf

24: news: theory factions/Bill Deagle, Ed Ward, Alex Jones:

Dr. Bill Deagle, who I[Ed Ward, MD ]
and possibly you[Alex Jones ]

 Letter To Alex Jones by Ed Ward, MD Friday, Apr. 06, 2007
 edward19@cox.net 832-428-3222

Great Job on the RO releases!
We could sure use a
'boycott 'O'Really' sponsors until he is off the air'.

A Letter To Alex Jones regarding todays show and content:
Dear Courageous, Patriotic, Brother Alex Jones (CPBAJ),
Great Job on the RO releases! http://www.defendrosie.com/
We could sure use a 'boycott 'O'Really' sponsors until he is off the air'.
Outright PC blackmail, real criminal investigations and charges
have come from his tyrannic criminal incitement of
hatred and reprisals for Freedom of Speech on questions and facts
from a government that has done nothing but lie to us for decades.
It's a Constitutional duty to question government, truth, and information. - IMO.

Dr. Bill Deagle, who I[Ed Ward, MD ]
and possibly you[Alex Jones ]
based on your gushing one page review of his 10 page bio,
believe him to be THE FORMOST EXPERT for 911 Tactics and Facts ­
- Has stated in his radio interview: 'The Best 911...',
and I can't remember the exact wording after that,
but it was along the lines of summation of evidence/debris
- It kinda blew me away, because I, like you,
knew of his impressive inside knowledge, expertise and credentials.
Another follow up interview is scheduled for Monday, April 9th.

Physicist Ron Larsen has called the articles "a fresh perspective"
(6:38), "Dr. Ward thinks like a scientist" (8:28),
"can spot hocum from yokum", "logical people like yourself" (55:20),
"dealt with issues that were beyond technical" (in other articles)(10:26),
read several of my referenced documented facts (over 100 of them in the first article) (11:00),
read the full quote of his later partial quote (12:30),
noted the beams thrown upward (1320).
"spent several hours looking over the research" (16:40),
notes the pyroclastic flows, their ability to carry fine particles
and the "vaporization of metals" (25:32),
notes the problems with reflectivity of conventional heat
vs much more powerful neuton (ray) heat (32:17),
makes a comparison between his, Gspooner and my methods (44:00),
"Dr. Ward is creating value for me" (45:30),
"clearly telling the truth", "neutrons could do something like this
(bend the 8 ton 6 inch thich beam) (46:08),
and notes rare legended LIDAR documented evidence of
massive craters around WTC 1, 2 and in WTC 6 (46:36).
Although, in what seems to be an interesting reversal,
his more recent newsletter
does not seem to share the same content.

http://media.putfile.com/RL-interview-Micro-Nukes-WTC
Micro-Nukes at the WTC
http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/06/09/25/ward.htm
Update: Micro-Nukes at the WTC
http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/07/03/05/ward.htm

A couple of my Ghost Troop fact finding friends (SiBr)
notified me that there may have been
some theory discussion on the WTC vehicles
in the vague reference to 2 articles dealing with them.
After listening to the show with William Rodriguez
and his excellent information and video,
and (video - help him for his courage by dispersing/buying his video/information
or making a donation to a True Patriotic American Hero).
and then listening to the Steven Jones segment
that dealt predominately with
'does not fit the evidence of
vague specificity space beams' ... .
11.25: news: Judy Wood - 9/11 Ten Years Later:
Judy D. Wood is a former professor of mechanical engineering
with research interests in experimental stress analysis,
structural mechanics, optical methods, deformation analysis,
and the materials characterization of biomaterials and composite materials.
Dr. Wood started to question the events of 9/11
on that same day when what she saw and heard on television
was contradictory and appeared to violate the laws of physics.
Since that day she has used her knowledge of engineering mechanics
to prove that the collapse of the World Trade Center twin towers
could not have happened as the American public was told.
She has written a lengthy book on the topic
Where Did The Towers Go?
Ten years have passed since the 

collapse of the World Trade Center.
In this interview,

 we'll discuss what has changed since 9/11
and why it is taking so long to rebuild on"Ground Zero."
Judy brings up evidence of directed energy weaponry

 used in the attack.
She'll explain some of the technical specifics
and why the information we've received is wrong.
Later, we talk about strange anomalies
related to the event and aftermath,
including spontaneous combustion and toasted cars.
25: Ron Larsen?
. Physicist Ron Larsen's Liberty Calling 3-17-07 Program "Micro-Nukes in the WTC"
by Ron Larsen/Ed Ward, MD Thursday, Mar. 15, 2007 at 12:31 PM
edward19@cox.net 832-428-3222
.     On Saturdays from 7:00 -- 9:00 PM CDT Dr. Ron Larsen, Ph.D. hosts the 'The Liberty Calling Beacon' program, presented live over the The Micro Effect network. Ron's guests for March 17 will be (Hour 1) will be Mr. Robert Balsamo, corporate and airline pilot and co-founder of Pilots for 9/11 Truth and (Hour 2) Dr. Ed Ward, M.D., author of The U.S. GovernmentÂ’s Usage of Atom Bombs and Update: The U.S. Governments Usage of Atom Bombs .
Physicist Ron Larsen's Liberty Calling 3-17-07 Program "Micro-Nukes in the WTC"
On Saturdays from 7:00 -- 9:00 PM CDT Dr. Ron Larsen, Ph.D. hosts the 'The Liberty Calling Beacon' program, presented live over the The Micro Effect network. Ron's guests for March 17 will be (Hour 1) will be Mr. Robert Balsamo, corporate and airline pilot and co-founder of Pilots for 9/11 Truth and (Hour 2) Dr. Ed Ward, M.D., author of The U.S. GovernmentÂ’s Usage of Atom Bombs and Update: The U.S. Governments Usage of Atom Bombs .
Ron LarsenÂ’s Scheduled Radio Program Appearances
Each Monday from 11:00 AM ' Noon CDT, Dr. Larsen is Drew Raines' guest on 'An American Disquisition', which airs over American Voice Radio . Each Friday from 6:00-7:00 PM CDT he is a regular guest on D'Anne Burley's 'Forensic Journalist' program, which is broadcast over Truth Radio . On Thursday, March 22, Dr. Larsen will be a guest of Dr. Bill Deagle, M.D. on his 'Nutrimedical Show', which airs over the the Genesis Communications Network (GCNLive) from 2:00-4:00 PM CDT .
Physicist Ron Larsen hosts “The Liberty Calling Beacon” radio program on Saturdays from 7-9 PM CDT
On Saturdays from 7:00 -- 9:00 PM CDT Dr. Ron Larsen, Ph.D. hosts the 'The Liberty Calling Beacon' program, presented live over the The Micro Effect network. RonÂ’s guests for March 17 will be (Hour 1) will be Mr. Robert Balsamo, corporate and airline pilot and co-founder of Pilots for 9/11 Truth and (Hour 2) Dr. Ed Ward, M.D., author of The U.S. GovernmentÂ’s Usage of Atom Bombs and Update: The U.S. Governments Usage of Atom Bombs . During Hour 1, from 7:00 until 8:00 PM CDT, of the Saturday, March 24 program, RonÂ’s special guest will be Virginia Goszewska, noted business performance consultant and personal life strategies coach will talk about her highly successful program Teaming with Success.
24: web: dr.jones not against cold fusion:
. I thought the following was interesting because
the various 9/11 Truther factions were
sneering at Jones for being a psyops plant,
and part of the evidence was his obstruction of
cold fusion .
. he is presented next as being more balanced,
saying that while the concept is real,
the first results were not finding the real cold fusion .
(PureEnergySystems.com > News > November 19, 2012)
"( Jones is experimenting with a bell electrode setup
that strongly evidences excess (xs) energy
and has similarities to the cell presented by
Pons and Fleischmann.
He says that there are at least two distinct phenomena
in these experiments and that "fusion"
is not what most of these
"CF" or "LENR" types of arrangements exhibit. )
11.24: web: history of cold fusion obstructionism:
LENR (Low Energy Nuclear Reactions)
 CALENR (Chemically Assisted Low Energy Nuclear Reactions)
LENR – ECat(Energy Catalyzer and LENR News)


11.24: web: www.3truth911.com:

THE THIRD TRUTH by Dimitri Khalezov

dead site www.3truth911.com has some backup:
. it's about the book:
THE THIRD TRUTH by Dimitri Khalezov

. the book was being sold at lulu:
THE THIRD TRUTH by Dimitri Khalezov
Publisher: Pisces All Media
Copyright: © 2009 Dimitri Khalezov Standard Copyright License
Language: English Country: Australia Edition: First Paperback Worldwide Edition
    Paperback book $51.74 Add to Cart
Printed: 539 pages, 8.26" x 11.69", perfect binding, black and white interior ink
Description:
Dimitri Khalezov- inside testimony about the real mastermind of 9/11 and many other NUCLEAR atrocities
- fully documented and detailed evidence about WHAT REALLY HAPPENED
in over a dozen incidents and how a sunken Russian submarine
was the beginning of the 9/11 plot
- in a scheme worthy of James Bond!
EXCEPT EVERY WORD IS TRUE... NOT TO BE MISSED
This book is also the world's most comprehensive
detailed and logical encyclopedia of
what actually happened on 9/11!

here is someone's report of the book:
An author of this book is a former officer of the Soviet nuclear intelligence
- known as the "military unit 46179"
or the "Special Control Service of the 12th Chief Directorate
of the Defense Ministry of the USSR".

He claims he was hired by the 9/11 perpetrators
as a kind of consultant prior to the September 11 attacks .
In this book he explains in detail how the World Trade Center
was demolished by its in-built thermo-nuclear demolition scheme
that consisted of three thermo-nuclear charges 150 kiloton each
- intended for the Twin Towers and WTC-7 destruction,
and how the US Government attempted to blame these three
underground thermo-nuclear explosions
on Manhattan's "ground zero"
on Saddam Hussein's alleged mini-nukes.
The author claims that the Soviet Special Control Service
knew about the World Trade Center nuclear demolition scheme
as long ago as in the 70s - in accordance
with the so-called "Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Treaty"
signed between the United States and the Soviet Union
- which obliged signatories to inform each other
on every nuclear device intended for civil purposes.
Besides, he claims to know personally a chief organizer of the 9/11 perpetration
and claims that the 9/11 project was nothing else than a
joint venture between French secret services and the Mossad,
in which the French had even greater role than their Israeli colleagues.
What about an actual 9/11 planning, it was, according to him,
bogus aerial attacks followed by misleading statements of the
WTC on-site construction managers

that were only intended to provoke officials of the
New York Department of Buildings

into the Twin Towers controlled demolition
using their in-built nuclear demolition features.
The WTC on-site construction managers bribed by the Mossad
managed to convince the Department of Buildings officials
that the Towers were allegedly in danger of collapse
and it was the right time to bring them down intentionally
in order to anticipate their "uncontrollable destruction"
that was allegedly dangerous to surrounding buildings.
The third count of nuclear destruction on Manhattan's
"ground zero" - a controlled demolition of the WTC-7,
which followed fate of its Twin sisters at 5.20 PM on September 11
- was nothing else than an earliest cover-up attempt,
hastily conceived by the New York Department of Buildings officials
who wanted to get rid of the last remaining evidence of the
scandalous WTC nuclear demolition scheme.
It is also claimed in this book that the WTC North Tower
(that was hit first, but collapsed second - contrary to any logic)
could not have been demolished before the South Tower
due to a merely technical reason.
The thermo-nuclear demolition charges
were always kept under the WTC-7 since its construction
(where it was easier to control and to maintain them);
these charges supposed to be delivered under the Twin Towers
only at the "H-hour" via special underground delivery tunnels
equipped with mini-railways.
Since the North Tower was closer to the WTC-7 than the South Tower,
it could not have been demolished first
- because a huge underground nuclear explosion under it
would cut off the "longer" delivery tunnel leading to underneath the "farther" Tower.

That is why, according to this demolition scenario,
the South Tower must be necessarily demolished first,
and only after it - the North Tower.
It could not have been otherwise.
Those who violated logic
were not demolition engineers that pressed red buttons,

but "terrorists" who directed "planes" into the Twin Towers
in the wrong order,

without studying the WTC demolition documentation first.
. an original idea of nuclear demolition of skyscrapers
was conceived and patented by the famous "Controlled Demolition Inc."
The main purpose to develop such demolition schemes
was not to actually demolish skyscrapers,
but only to find a loophole in existing laws
that did not permit construction of new skyscrapers
unless an architect would offer a solution on
how to demolish them in the future.
This company began to study possibilities of demolishing skyscrapers by
huge underground nuclear explosions at the end of 60s
on request of the then New York State Governor Nelson Rockefeller
who wanted to built the Twin Towers
but did not know how to avoid the demolition requirements.
Moreover, the author of this book claims that such a thermo-nuclear demolition scheme
designed by the "Controlled Demolition Inc."
was implemented not only in the World Trade Center in New York,
but in the Sears Tower in Chicago as well.
The 9/11 Pentagon missile attack is also explained in this book
in pretty exact detail - the author names a certain Soviet-made anti-ship supersonic cruise missile
that was fired at the Pentagon and struck it exactly at its "water-line" level
- a typical anti-ship missile's behavior.
According to his claims the missile was primarily intended to be used against
the US aircraft-carriers and it was equipped with its usual
half-Megaton thermo-nuclear warhead.
He explains also where the 9/11 perpetrators managed to steal such a missile
[and obviously removed the warhead ?]

. appearance of this missile in the US airspace caused
the most serious atomic alert in the entire American history ...

The 9/11 atomic alert also resulted in scrambling of a "doomsday plane"
(that was designed to conduct a retaliatory missile strike against the Soviet Union)
and in re-naming the 9/11 affair from the "Act of Terror" into the "Act of War".
The "doomsday plane" managed to take off approximately 2 minutes
ahead of the missile's arrival into the Pentagon

and by the time of expected annihilation of Washington D.C. it was already far from it
- being in a position to transmit orders to launch ICBMs against Russia.
His other claim is that the unexploded thermo-nuclear warhead
found in between the Pentagon's Ring "B" and Ring "C"
is being currently confiscated by the FBI
but it could only be confidentially shown to high-ranking officials
in order to convince them to fight against Iraqis
- the supposed owners of this weapon of mass destruction.

. the anthrax letters attack ... was a purely inside job
- intended to create an impression that the US-made anthrax powder
belonged to Saddam Hussein
and so to convince Democratic Senators
that it was really necessary to attack Iraq
and to deprive it of its alleged "weapons of mass destruction".

. goes into other acts of the so-called "nuclear terrorism":
2002 Bali "micro-nuclear" bombing,
1995 Oklahoma nuclear bombing,
1983 Beirut Barracks double nuclear bombing,
1997 Khobar Towers nuclear bombing,
2006 maxi-nuclear bombing at Madrid Barajas Airport,

... corrects the most common misconceptions
in regard to nuclear and mini-nuclear weapons
(popularly known as "mini-nukes" and "micro-nukes")
and in regard to their real and imaginary use by various "terrorists"
in disguise of "car-bombings" and "truck-bombings".
In the same time, the author provides sufficient proof that
neither the WTC Twin Towers demolition,
nor the WTC building #7 demolition
had anything to do with Saddam Hussein's or Osama bin Laden's "mini-nukes"
as believed by many conspiracy theorists,
including those in the US Government.

.. is the first 9/11 researcher who managed to satisfactorily explain
a hitherto unexplainable 9/11 phenomenon
- instant pulverizations of
thick steel columns of the WTC Twin Towers and the WTC-7
that allowed these steel-frame buildings to
collapse at near freefall speed.
He explains this microscopic dust phenomenon remarkably simply,
based on some specific properties of deep underground nuclear explosions
- capable of creating extensive so-called "crashed zones" around their cavities.
Moreover, the author claims that specialists from "Controlled Demolition Inc."
who designed the WTC demolition project,
have greatly miscalculated required TNT yields of demolition charges in regard to the
actual Twin Towers lengths.
While the third 150 kiloton thermo-nuclear charge was
able to completely pulverize the 47-story WTC building # 7
up to its top inclusive,
it was not so with the first two 150 kiloton charges.
They managed to pulverize the Twin Towers till only about 75-80% of their entire lengths,
leaving their tops damaged to a much lesser extent.
It resulted in disasters - the heavy tops of the Twin Towers,
which lost their supporting bases simply crashed downwards,
scattering some debris to great distances around
that resulted in unexpected damages caused by these falling debris.

The book basically proves that some desperate US officials
who did not know how to behave after the WTC collapses
and unprecedented levels of radiation recorded on the "ground zero"
have concocted two "truths" (both untrue) intended to
cover-up the Twin Towers nuclear demolition
and the Pentagon missile attack:
one for "plebs"
(a well-known report of the 9/11 Commission,
alias its infamous kerosene / pancake collapse theory),
and one - for "patricians"
(a secret Saddam's mini-nukes theory that is
"confidentially" available only for high-ranking people
- both home and abroad;
plus the Pentagon's missile that was also blamed on Saddam).
This book successfully disproves both official lies ..
and establishes that it was the Department of Buildings of New York
and the "Controlled Demolition Inc."
who were truly responsible for that unprecedented
World Trade Center nuclear demolition
in the middle of a populated city
and for all cases of chronic radiation sickness,
leukemia and cancer suffered by Ground Zero responders
and by nearby Manhattan residents.
. the book-reporter wraps up with
Information on details of nuclear demolition ideas
in general could be found here:
http://www.nuclear-demolition.com
Information on details of 2002 Bali bombing
where a "micro-nuke" was used .
[dead site] http://www.bali-bombing.com
--[ something similar at a false-flag gov conspiracy vid ].
Information on details of 1995 Oklahoma bombing
where a "mini-nuke" was used could be found here:
www.oklahoma-bombing.com
Information on details of 1998 Khobar Towers bombing
where a "mini-nuke" was used could be found here:
www.khobar-bombing.com
. according to the book reporter above:
911thology.com is about a "new exact science"
9/11 theology or -ology .
. 911thology currently has an urgent message from
the book's author, Dimitri Khalezov:
. I would like to apologize for my disappearance from public view,
but now I am back. Thanks to God, I am still alive.
Unlike my friend Mr. Vadim Alexandrovski
who helped me to compile my 9/11 research
and who was recently murdered in Bangkok
- apparently for his help in obtaining the confirmation
about the "Granit" missile that hit the Pentagon.
However, I urgently need your help. It seems I am in trouble now.
Please, download, keep secure and redistribute
as widely as possible these four encrypted zip-archives: ...

. further details found in Nov 18, 2012 vid:
this info is to blackmail the country he currently resides
into not conspiring against him .

. the vid also states,
the wiki article about the military unit 46179
is still available elsewhere .
. wiki also mentions that here:
. 12th GU MO is responsible for safe-keeping, technical maintenance,
transportation, delivery, issuance, disposal, etc.
There is a smaller autonomous organization within the main 12th GU MO structure
– known as “military unit 46179”, “the Special Control Service of the Defense Ministry,”
“atomic intelligence,” or “nuclear intelligence” of the former Soviet Union.
The Special Control Service is tasked with gathering intelligence on nuclear weapons
and particularly on nuclear testing of various adversaries
of the former USSR by all means – ranging from six technical control methods
to analyzing radio-intercepts and periodicals.

. more about that connection can be found at
a Truth Seeker's page about Khalezov .
. author's main site has many doc's about 9/11.
. it includes a .zip about 9/11 cancers .
. one reads:
[!] news.pol/purges/controlled demolition/
radioactivity may be confused with demolished carcinogens

24: news:
Dr.Wood at National Press Club 2007
INTERVIEW WITH DR. JUDY WOOD AND DR. GREG JENKINS
vid:  Uploaded by jayc2469 on Nov 20, 2010
This is the FULL, 'unedited' interview (Part 1 of 3)
of Dr Judy Wood by Dr Greg Jenkins.
National Press Club, Washington, DC, January 10th 2007
Transcript by Arabesque
Analysis by Dr. Greg Jenkins and Arabesque1
Jim Fetzer:
“I must say I think we’re finding out Judy, what happened on 9/11.
I’m just blown away by your work.
This is the most fascinating development in the history of the study of 9/11...
I’m going to make a wild guess Judy;
I’m going to presume that these [directed energy] beams
had to be located in Building 7?”
Judy Wood: “Nope. I don’t think so.”
Fetzer: “Planes?”
Judy Wood:” No... I think it’s very likely it’s in orbit.”
Fetzer: “Oh Really?? Oh ho ho ho ho!
Oh Judy. Oh my oh my oh my oh my.
This is huge... this is huge Judy.”2

Abstract:
As the above quotation suggests, Dr. Judy Wood is one of the
first and foremost supporters of the hypothesis that
Directed Energy Weapons destroyed the World Trade Centers on 9/11.
This topic is discussed and analyzed in the following interview
between Wood and Dr. Greg Jenkins on January 10th, 2007.
The relevant features of Judy Wood’s hypothesis
are discussed and shown to be wholly inadequate and unscientific.
Many of Wood’s weakly supported arguments rely on
misinterpretations about “what happened”
that are subsequently used to advance misleading explanations for
“how it happened”.
The topic covered in this interview is also dealt with extensively in Dr. Jenkin’s paper,
The Overwhelming Implausibility of Using Directed Energy Beams
to Demolish the World Trade Center.3
[25: Dr. Greg Jenkins is working for the NSA?
His agenda to disproof her is clear. Watch

 Uploaded by Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez on Mar 28, 2010
Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez
M4 Medical Student
B.S. Biology / Neurobiology

I am very grateful to Dr. Greg Jenkins for conducting
his ambush interview of Dr. Judy Wood,
because his agenda actually highlighted the importance of Dr. Wood's work.
The amount of effort being put forth to attempt to discredit Dr. Wood
and convince people to not look at the
overwhelming sum of evidence she has gathered
is truly remarkable. I find it very interesting that Dr. Jenkins,
who works/worked for NSA, showed up with full lighting and camera crews
after a talk given by Dr. Fetzer,
who had insisted Dr. Wood attend his talk.
No one else knew Dr. Wood would be there.
Just as she was leaving, around 12am,
Jenkins spontaneously confronted Dr. Wood
and asked her to do an interview on the spot.
... As Dr. Wood often says,
you first need to determine WHAT happened,
before you determine HOW it happened.
If you skip the first part and assume you know what happened,
further discussion tends to be rather meaningless and unscientific.
Dr. Wood identified that the buildings were transformed to dust,
and for some strange reason,
Dr. Jenkins really wanted to avoid discussing that topic.
... puts Richard Gage and Dr. Steven Jones
in a very difficult position,
because thermite does not
turn buildings into powder in mid air,
nor do explosives of any kind... :)

Here is the transcript from the interview,
which allows for a more detailed analysis of the dialogue:

Here is the official release of Greg Jenkins'
original video recording of the interview,
which includes the additional content
that he added before the video was released:

Here is a brief summary of the thousands of photos, videos, graphs, and documents Dr. Judy Wood has gathered,
which explosives of any kind do NOT explain:
http://www.drjudywood.com/wtc
Has the 9/11 "Truth" Movement Always Been Corrupt?
25: "(  September 11, 2006 that bells and whistles started going off for me. For it was on that day I met Dr. Judy Wood and Morgan Reynolds at a 9-11 "Truth" event in Washington, DC, along with “patriot” Colonel Robert Bowman (Ronald Reagan's Space Wars directed energy weapons guy). I introduced myself to Reynolds and Wood, but not without caution. I had read all over the Internet they were "dis-info" agents, so I approached them with reservation, curious to find out for myself why they had resigned from Scholars. After hearing how their research has been undermined, however, what I had been absorbing as Gospel Truth all suddenly started collapsing in rapid free-fall style.
 New York's majestic skyscrapers clearly did not merely explode a la controlled demolition, but rather, were somehow otherwise pulverized into a voluminous quantity of fine dust powder... quite unlike any known conventional demolition event that preceded it.
. the POTUS and his shadowy backers
had carried out the whole deal in order to manufacture justification
and garner support from Americans for the
illegal invasion, destruction, radioactive poisoning,
and theft of resources - and poppy income in the Middle East.

Dr. Judy Wood, presented evidence
showing why other methods were implausible
to explain the pulverized dust.
In essence, Dr. Wood presented evidence for us to consider,
and simply asked the reader to open their own eyes
and decide what happened for theirself.
Dr. Wood and another researcher, Andrew Johnson,
began to report o fascinating experiments conducted by
John Hutchison which demonstrated some proof of
Nikola Tesla's concepts, making a clear case for
certain types of advanced energy phenomena
discovered at Ground Zero.
. a fusion scientist's murder
- a fellow who dared dispute the Los Alamos Weapons Lab-trained head
Truth Movement's fusion scientist's work.
And then, too, is another murder - this one of a grad student
who just so happened to have worked as Dr. Judy Wood's assistant
in an experiment designed to debunk work of the Truth Movement's fusion scientist
regarding the glowing of aluminum.
Even more intriguing?
This now dead student was the nephew of the fellow
who replaced the murdered scientist as
Editor of an advanced energy magazine.
Resources:
LIHOP and MIHOP courtesy of Nico Haupt
Reliable source of all things decent, honest, and true,
President George W. Bush agrees with the Truth Movement
that explosives were planted in the towers .
Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Disintegrate?
Thermite Hypothesis - Consider the Science
Physical Effects and Pictures of Advanced Energy
The works of Andrew Johnson,
Alternative Researcher with "other [good] ideas"
Timeline: Fusion trashing, independent researchers,
the 9-11 Movement's Advanced Energy Choirboy, and 2 murders
Dr. Judy Wood's Grad Student
Science Researcher Murdered

Murder of Cold Fusion Scientist Who
Stood Up to Dr. Steven Jones murder

Learn more about Disinformation - What is it? How's it used?

Thinking About 9-11, the Truth, and the Official Movement

Really strange things about the WTC - Evidence of Directed Energy Weapon use

Research of Dr. Judy Wood and Michael Zebuhr (murdered grad student) on Glowing Aluminum
and Hurricane Erin - Closest to WTC on 9-11 - Surprise Surprise!

and goes.gsfc.nasa.gov/pub/goes/010911.erin.towers.gif 
and spaceweather.ac.cn/publication/jgrs/2003/Geophysical_Research_Letters/2002GL016741.pdf

"(This paper addresses the impact of moisture profile data sets derived from the Lidar Atmospheric Sensing Experiment (LASE) for the assimilation and forecasts of hurricanes. LASE is a vertical profiler for moisture measurements that was developed at NASA Langley Research Center. LASE was deployed on board the NASA DC-8 research aircraft and provided vertical profiles of moisture in a hurricane environment during the Convection and Moisture Experiment-4, which occurred in August and September 2001. In this preliminary study we show results from two types of experiments (with and without LASE data) that show improvements in track and intensity forecasts of hurricanes, Erin, Humberto and Gabrielle. When the LASE moisture profiles are assimilated, track errors are reduced by 100 km and intensity errors are reduced by 20–25% for 3 day forecasts.)
How to Spot a 9-11 Spook) ]
....
12.12: I sorted these links:
-- I delete what's seen, trivial, or not trusted
because the author is opposing Dr.Wood .
1 Arabesque, Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice Member and 9/11 Researcher:.
2 Jim Fetzer interviews Judy Wood,
Non-Random Thoughts on RBN Live, 2006

3 Greg Jenkins, The Overwhelming Implausibility of
Using Directed Energy Beams
to Demolish the World Trade Center,
www.journalof911studies.com
6 http://dc911truth.org/
13 Project for a New American Citizen:
Steven Jones Lecture in Austin Texas, April 14, 2007.

16 David Ray Griffin, The Destruction of the World Trade Center:
Why the Official Account Cannot Be True.
Authorized Version (with references & notes).
17 Jim Hoffman, Missing Building Contents:
Most Contents of the Towers Were Turned to Dust,
42 Greg Jenkins, Jim Fetzer and his ‘Lying Eyes’ 2007.
11.25: news: Dr. Gregory S. Jenkins, Ph.D. Physics`
The Overwhelming Implausibility of Using Directed Energy Beams
to Demolish the World Trade Center Towers (Updated 4/12/07)
/ Potential Energy Versus Richter Scale Readings:

Seismograph readings were used by Dr. Wood as evidence
that much of the debris from the towers never hit the ground.
She used an erroneous scaling argument ....
[12.12: get her side of this from her site .]

11.25: web: evidence of nukes via seismic data?

'9/11thology'

12.3: co.youtube#AlienScientist/not thermite alone
me:"(lasers can't do reproduce the thermite reaction)?
you misunderstand Wood's theory:
it doesn't need lasers;
what the hutchison effect needs is the
static field from hurricane erin,
and the RF waves from a
modified clean nuclear device .
. that explains the nuclear pyroclastics
and the hutchison effects .
. nanothermite may have been added for use as cutters
to sequence the nuclear-DEW implosion .
AlienScientist:
So an offshore hurricane provides a "static field"
that can be harnessed and deployed
HOW??? Are you [developmentally challenged]?
This "Remote Frequency modified clean nuclear device",
how was it deployed? Space based?
Placed inside the buildings?
How was it "modified"?
What frequency does it use,
and where was it remotely located?
This explains NOTHING,
only adds more mud to the water and more
cognitive distraction from HARD EVIDENCE,
like we have for nanothermite.
me:
"Radio Frequency modified clean nuclear device",
how deployed? Placed inside the buildings,
energized with clean nuclear .
How was it "modified"?
that is conjectured to be classified usa gov info .
What frequency does it use? many random .
hurricane provides a "static field"?
how can it be harnessed and deployed?
weather control is not classified, google it .
. this explains the Hutchison effects .

12.3:
. you ask for Wood proof by experimentation
but you haven't even proven your own theory:
. nothing you can do with military thermites
can reproduce experimentally both the
pyroclastics and the hutchison effects .
. Wood can't prove tech she can't access;
but her theory explains the hutchison effects
thermite theory does not .
. only nucear-driven dew explains both
 the pyroclastics and the hutchison effects .
AlienScientist
YES I HAVE!!! I worked directly with
my uncle Jonathan Cole PE as a technical adviser
for his experiments!!!
Google "9/11 experiments"
"the great thermate debate"!!!
We actually did the experiments to disprove the shills
like National Geographic and Discovery Channel
who were lying and telling us that thermite couldn't be
used to cut vertical steel columns!
If we could get the funding,
we would gladly perform MORE experiments!
Wood has a Ph.D. in interferometry...
OF COURSE SHE CAN!!!
(Dr.Wood's link for this rebuttal)
me:
. thanks for helping find "9/11 experiments"
 "the great thermate debate"
your video is believable and I am glad you
"(would gladly perform MORE experiments!)
because here is what you have to prove next:
when has thermite EVER been used to
completely pulverize buildings?
thermite only cuts and melts .
Exactly how much energy would be required to
pulverize 80-90% of each WTC tower?
. show how thermites can generate sufficient energy .

unburned paper is not good example of hutchison effects:
12.1: This comment has received too many negative votes
. you state Wood also says that
evidence of thermite products is actually
hutchison products and/or is just a distraction .
. if she did say that, she may simply
not be cool-headed on her feet;
but check her website for what she has time to think about .
. what her site says is that
no thermite experiment
can explain the hutchison effects .
all the hutchison effects
are explained by nanothermite?
why didn't nanothermite burn the papers?
why just burn the chrome door handles off?
AlienScientist
YES! Listen to the May 2011 Coast to Coast Interview!
This is cognitive infiltration, not a "mistake" as you claim...
Listen yourself!
These were two of the largest
office buildings in the entire FORKing world.
They obviously contains TONS of paper.
Obviously some of that paper is going to survive the
controlled demolition and blowing up of the buildings.
That's common FORKing sense.
You don't need exotic, unproven, and scientifically
undocumented effects to explain that...
12.2:
I'd like some experimentation too; because,
intuition tells me that if nano-thermite can produce
--* massive pyroclastics *--
it will also heat up any paper too;
the papers can only be explained by
--* Hutchison effects *--
which we can't experiment with because,
you need so many varieties of RF waves
for a sure reaction with the static field,
only a nuclear device can provide this
and only our gov is allowed to experiment with that .
12.4: AlienScientist
It could be a form of chemical attack
which only causes corrosion of metal.
The best way to tell would be to
get some SEM images of the actual corrosion itself
and do some spectrographic NMR analysis on the metal itself
to determine what's there
and what really happened.
Of course, the paper and corrosive material
may not have been present at the same time either.
The paper could have fallen on top of everything
after the heavier incendiary compounds cooled off.
me:
. that's a good response to the paper;
have you seen all the toasted cars at Dr.Wood's site?
they looked burned in strange ways,
like they were in a microwave oven or something
not just burned from being in the path of embers .


12.1: This comment has received too many negative votes
Wood has attacked all nanothermite evidence?
she has not! she simply said (in sum)
that nanothermite does not explain the Hutchison effects .
. you have good work with nanothermite;
I believe it was both nanothermite and
nuclear RF-static field dustifiers
that were at work for 9/11's demolition .
AlienScientist
Ok, so do these "nuclear RF-static field dustifiers"
actually exist? Where can I find one?
How do I make one?
What frequencies do I use to resonate
with both concrete and structural steel?
How do these electromagnetic effects
penetrate beyond the skin depth of a closed conductive material
like the Aluminum cladding of the towers?
Wouldn't that function as a giant Faraday cage
blocking all external EM penetration?
Where are the patents?
Why are you lying about Wood's
attacks on nanothermite???
 12.2:
 "(Why are you lying about
  Wood's attacks on nanothermite???)

. what evidence do you have I'm lying?
here is what you are referring to I believe:
"( Wood has attacked all nanothermite evidence?
she has not! she simply said (in sum)
that nanothermite does not explain the Hutchison effects .
) . the phrase in "(she simply said (in sum))
completely covers my ass; ask any lawyer .
. again,
you have good work with nanothermite;
I believe it was both nanothermite and
nuclear RF-static field tech .

12.3: co.youtube#beachcomber2008/not thermite alone/
Paper survives high speed aircraft impacts:
Paper survives high speed aircraft impacts.
There is a physical equation for it.
But the easiest way you can check is
pick ANY air crash investigation video.
The degree to which you believe the
reverse of the truth in this
is the degree to which you have sunk.
me:
I will take your word for it that
"(Paper survives high speed aircraft impacts)
but why is the fallout from this demolition
burning the cars but not the papers ?
. I would say Hutchison effects a la Dr.Wood .
beachcomber2008 Dec 3
has posted a comment on your channel
You can reply to this comment by visiting your comments page.

 Steel fragments striking cars at 120 mph
set them on fire. There's nothing special in that.
WTC7's fires also started by pieces of WTC1 hitting it.
Steel makes sparks. The faster its collision speed,
then the more prolific these sparks are going to be.
I place my comment here because the channel has blocked me.
me:
I agree, steel fragments striking cars at 120 mph
set them and not nearby paper on fire;
but have you seen dr.Wood's evidence of Hutchison effects?
why in some places would it burn a door handle
and not the surrounding door?
look carefully at how the cars were burned;
it's too weird not to be some new tech .


12.3: news: Experts Speak Out against usa gov on PBS 2012.9.11:
Sep 3, 2012  "9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out"
"9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out"
is getting public attention and
casting doubt on the scientific validity of
the U.S. government's investigation into the WTC tragedy.
PBS is the first major network to air the program.
Just days away from the 11th anniversary of the
World Trade Center tragedy
and months away from the U.S. presidential election,
a game-changing 9/11 documentary
is ranking number three among
"most watched" documentaries on PBS
and number one among "most shared."
. see similar:
shop.ae911truth.org
911expertsspeakout.org
. books from professionals refuting USA gov reports .

#9-11 #holocaust #denial pushback @PBS:
(antipsychotic, pol, purges, war, bbb, fig-leafer, democracy, fundamentalism, gov,  ID theft, mark of the beast, 9-11, 616, wmd, silicosis, cancer, suicide, conspiracy, meant-all, )
[!] news.pol/purges/controlled demolition/Experts Speak Out against usa gov on PBS 2012.9.11
11.20: Dr.Wood interviewed by OneStepBeyond`Theo Chalmers:
(title: Nov 15, 2011 Directed Energy Technology)
[!] book: Wood`where did the towers go?


12.7: news: Fetzer has joined Judy
in promoting this energy-beam idea
from Steven E. Jones to Greg Jenkins:
Subject: Judy Wood interview
Relayed On: Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007
The reason I ask is this -- Yesterday I watched your
interesting interview with Judy Wood on this topic.
(http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-558096240694803017)
That was the first time I had heard Dr. Wood on a video,
and she does try there to defend the
energy-beam from space theory she is promoting.
(Which as you must know, is causing
quite a schism in the community right now...)
Jim Fetzer has joined Judy in promoting this energy-beam idea
-- he suggests in his Tucson talk,
the beam which hit the Towers came from WTC 7
here: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=646337772656177512